A lawsuit has been filed by 16 of the victim’s families from the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings against the shooter’s mother. There are many other lawsuits, but this one may be settled soon, pending a judge’s approval of a proposed settlement.
Before going to the Sandy Hook Elementary School, where he would senselessly slaughter children and teachers, Adam Lanza’s first victim was his own mother, who was killed in her home in Newton, Connecticut.
That, however, did not stop the families of some of his other victims from suing her estate.
Lanza used his mother Nancy’s rifle during the shootings at the school. The theory behind the lawsuit against her estate is that she failed to properly secure the rifle from getting into the hands of her disturbed son.
A settlement has been reached between lawyers for her estate and lawyers for the victims’ families under which the families would equally split her $1.5 million homeowner’s insurance proceeds.
The Associated Press reported this story in a recent article titled “Correction: Newton Shooting – Lawsuits Story.”
For the settlement to be considered final, a judge needs to approve it.
Setting aside any politics and emotions about the Sandy Hook tragedy, this case raises an interesting question. Is it fair to hold the victim of a shooting’s estate responsible for the actions of another person?
Lawyers for the suing families suggest that this lawsuit is mostly symbolic as a warning to gun owners that they need to keep their weapons stored securely.
Reference: Associated Press (August 5, 2015) “Correction: Newton Shooting – Lawsuits Story.”
For more information on estate planning, please visit my estate planning website.
